Built multiple venture-backed startups with Wavect over 4 years. World class team. They’re great thought partners while in discovery, reliable and predictable engineers while in dev, and just generally great guys to work with. Highly highly recommend you work with this team for your next project.
Vibe Coding Rescue for an AI-built app that needs repair.
Your AI-built app works in a demo, but real users are finding problems. We assess the code, prioritize security and data risks, and repair the agreed issues with tests your team can rerun. The assessment determines what to keep and what needs changing.
Cancel any week. Last week refunded if we didn’t blow you away. No hours tracked.
- 100+ products shipped
- 10+ years experience
- No-Bullshit Guarantee
CHOOSE THIS WHEN
Choose Vibe Coding Rescue when an AI-generated prototype needs a one-time audit and targeted hardening before real users, due diligence, or production.
BEST FOR
- A Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, or Claude Code build with unknown security and reliability gaps.
- A team that needs an evidence-based keep, harden, or rebuild decision.
NOT BEST FOR
- Ongoing independent release testing after the product is stable.
- A vendor handover that needs access recovery and continued maintenance.
What breaks in vibe-coded apps
45%
of tests introduced security flaws in Veracode’s 2025 study (Veracode, 2025)
The demo works. That is the trap. Apps built with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, or Claude Code look finished and fail exactly where a demo never looks: authorization, data access, payments, and the unhappy paths nobody prompted for. The fixes are known and boring, which is the good news:
- ✓Broken access control. The user-A-reads-user-B’s-data bug: row-level security left off, missing authorization checks, client-side auth anyone can skip.
- ✓Secrets in the open. API keys committed to the repo, staging and production sharing one database, logs leaking tokens and personal data.
- ✓Payments that lie. Webhook handling, refund flows, and subscription state that look right in a demo and quietly drop money in production.
Two ways in
Vibe Code Audit
A fixed-scope read of the code the model wrote and you may never have. We map the architecture, score every finding by severity, and hand back a prioritized list of what to fix and in what order. Usually a few days, and it stands on its own if you want to fix things yourself.
Full Rescue
We take the findings and fix them: close the security and data holes, repair payments and the unhappy paths, add a regression suite, and wire up CI and monitoring. You get back a version that is safe for real users, not a PDF of complaints.
How a rescue runs
Every engagement runs the same disciplined path, so nothing ships by accident and nothing critical gets skipped.
Audit
We read the codebase, map the architecture, and scan for the security, data, and scaling gaps AI tools reliably leave behind.
Triage
Findings ranked by severity, plus an honest keep-vs-rebuild call on the generated code, not a reflex to throw it away.
Harden
Close broken access control and leaked secrets, fix payments and the unhappy paths, and make production and staging actually separate.
Test
A regression suite, so the next AI edit does not silently break what already works.
Ship
CI, observability, and rollbacks, so you see failures early and can undo a bad deploy in seconds.
Handover
Runbooks and a walkthrough. You own and run it; maintenance is optional, not baked in.
Built into every rescue
Honest keep-vs-rebuild call
We do not rewrite for the sake of it. If the generated code is structurally sound, we harden it and move on. If a module is beyond saving, we say so and scope the smallest rebuild that fixes it, not a teardown that bills for months.
Handover, not lock-in
Every rescue ends with docs, tests, and a walkthrough so your team can run and extend it. Ongoing maintenance is an option, never a dependency we quietly build in.
What a rescue covers
The full production-readiness pass, the same lens we apply to anything built with vibe coding.
- ✓Authorization on every endpoint. The class of bug demos never surface, checked route by route.
- ✓Input validation and unhappy paths. The cases the prompt never asked for, closed before a user finds them.
- ✓Secrets and environments. Keys out of the repo, staging and production actually separated.
- ✓Error handling that fails closed. No stack traces leaked to users, no silent swallowing of failures.
- ✓Observability and rollbacks. You see failures when they happen and can undo a bad deploy.
- ✓A regression suite. So the next AI edit does not silently break what already works.
Tools we rescue from
Built with one of these? We have read its output before and know how it cuts corners.
How we run a rescue
- ✓Fixed scope, signed. We work to a written statement of work and are legally bound to deliver it. No open-ended hourly meter, no scope that drifts once the invoices start.
- ✓Keep what works. AI-generated code is not automatically garbage. We harden the parts that are sound and only replace what genuinely has to go, so you pay for fixes, not ego rewrites.
- ✓Senior engineers only. The people reading your code have shipped production systems for years and know exactly how AI tools cut corners. No juniors learning on your codebase.
- ✓You own it at the end. Documentation, a regression suite, and a walkthrough. The goal is that you run the product without us on the phone forever.
Rebuild from scratch, or rescue what you have?
Usually rescue.A full rebuild costs months you may not have. Most vibe-coded apps need hardening, not a teardown.
Talk to an expert
Your prototype rescue plan
Example outputs for a rescue assessment. We inspect the existing app before agreeing which repairs to build.
Keep, harden or rebuild
Review the critical user paths, architecture, permissions and dependencies. Identify reusable code and release blockers.
Repairs in delivery order
Reproducible findings ranked by user impact, with effort, dependencies and acceptance checks for each repair.
Evidence for the next release
Retest agreed fixes and critical flows. Hand over the results, remaining risks and rollback steps.
Download the sample rescue findings and release decision (Markdown)
// proofProof, not promises
Twinsoft AI reached enterprise pilot readiness in two weeks after we rebuilt its prototype foundations. Soundromeda hardened a vibe-coded game through risk-based QA. PromptID kept its production quality bar by cutting scope when the timeline shrank. Three concrete ways to get a pressured product ready to ship.
Took a vibe-coded prototype to enterprise pilot-ready, no shortcuts.
QA-led hardening took a vibe-coded game prototype to a state grant committees backed.
AI-native assessment platform, 0→production in 6 weeks under compressed market pressure.
These are selected projects, not our full portfolio. We have shipped 100+ products since 2018.
What clients say
Delivered all work on time, even under tight deadlines. The perfect balance between professional standards and a collaborative working relationship.
Getting to know Kevin was very exciting! He is burning for his topics and is a guy who is walking the extra mile. His thoughts and passioned approach for the work is absolutely amazing. He has a holistic view and is not stuck in tech topics at all. His huge strength is that he knows the customer’s requirements and understands them without needing to ask what they want.
Also his will to constantly get to know the latest knowledge is felt in the daily work. Since the web3 area is a highly dynamic one this is a necessity and Kevin is coping with it like a charm.
Independently rated 5.0/5 on Clutch Read the reviews
A budget for bugs. A price for accepted results.
For a working app, including a vibe-coded one: choose a bounded functional test pass, optional accepted findings and separately approved repairs. Set the spending limit before work starts.
Your ceiling comes first
Coverage + up to 5 accepted findings: at most €1,500. Repairs need a separately approved quote within your total cap. Unused authorization is not invoiced.
Test the agreed scope
€750
One coverage pass across up to 12 agreed scenarios and 3 journeys. You receive the results even when no bug is found.
Per accepted finding
€150
One material, reproducible defect. Same root cause or same corrective change: one fee. Severity changes priority, never this price.
Per accepted repair
- Small
- €600
- Standard
- €1,200
Eligible small repair: €600. Standard repair: €1,200. An already paid €150 finding fee is credited toward that repair.
Already know the bug? For a bug you can reproduce, request a repair-only quote. No finding fee; a coverage pass is needed only if separately agreed.
Net prices; applicable tax is additional. One-off scope with its own correction/refund terms; an alternative to weekly QA for the same work.
FAQs
Honest answers about fixing vibe-coded and AI-generated apps
Optional Fast Lane
Need it sooner?
More agreed work in the same week, or the same scope sooner, with extra reserved capacity and unchanged quality checks. Miss the booked earlier date and 100% of the Fast Lane surcharge comes back.
Optional per milestone, quoted after a readiness check.
More in Artificial Intelligence
AI Agents & Products
We build AI agents, agentic SaaS, and LLM apps that survive production, and tell you when AI is the wrong tool.
Read MoreAI Enablement
Adopt AI inside your own team: workshops plus done-for-you setup on your infrastructure. No shelfware.
Read MoreInternal AI Assistants
Scope an internal AI assistant around approved sources, permissions and a measured pilot. Compare licensed tools, configured retrieval and custom development.
Explore the scopeMCP Server Development
MCP servers that let AI agents use your product or internal tools, with OAuth, scoped permissions, versioning and real client tests.
Explore the scopeAI Chatbot Development
Customer-facing AI chatbots for websites, shops and messaging, grounded in your data, with order and returns support and human handoff.
Explore the scopeDocument AI
Extract document fields, check them against business rules and route exceptions to people before records reach your systems.
Explore the scopeMachine Learning
Test forecasting, classification and anomaly detection against real business decisions, with baselines, holdouts and an operational fallback.
Explore the scopeComputer Vision
Build image recognition, object detection or visual inspection around real capture conditions, measured errors and an explicit review path.
Explore the scopeMLOps
Connect dataset versions, repeatable training, evaluation gates, model releases and drift monitoring into an owned operating routine.
Explore the scopeAI Evaluation & LLMOps
Test model, prompt, retrieval and tool changes against real tasks, with traces, release criteria and cost visibility.
Explore the scopeAI Delivery Sprint
Commission one defined AI workflow with a readiness check, written acceptance criteria and an agreed production handover.
Explore the scopeEmbedded AI Engineering
An engineer embedded in your delivery rhythm, owning a defined AI implementation and transferring it to your team.
Explore the scopeData Annotation
Define labels, calibrate reviewers and deliver versioned datasets with quality checks for training and evaluation.
Explore the scope