01/PROJECT
Fixed prices
- One agreed scope.
- One fixed price.
- Binding delivery.
Quality Assurance
Software Testing and Independent QA
Catch user-facing bugs before users do. Manual testing, automation, and the outside eyes your team can’t have on its own code, paired with a No-Bullshit Guarantee so the first week is risk-free.
First week not worth it? Refunded, no questions.
- €750/week from week one
- Cancel anytime
- No-Bullshit Guarantee
Release pipeline
- Clean change
- Defect caught before release
- Defect reached production
DIRECT ANSWER
Choose independent QA when a live product needs ongoing manual testing, automation, regression gates, and an external view of release risk.
BEST FOR
- Teams that need an external view of product and release risk.
- Software that needs repeatable quality gates, not just a one-off bug list.
NOT BEST FOR
- Staff augmentation without ownership of a quality outcome.
- A superficial checkbox review with no access to the product and delivery process.
What You’ll Get From Your 30-Minute Strategy Call
1
Expert Analysis
A personalized evaluation of your current QA challenges and opportunities.
2
Custom Roadmap
Clear next steps tailored to your specific software quality needs.
3
Cost Saving Insights
Identify immediate opportunities to reduce development costs and prevent expensive bugs.
→
Only 2 spots remaining this week
First week not worth it? Refunded, no questions.
Where bugs hide. We look there.
Manual Testing
Test from the user’s seat, not the developer’s.
Test Automation
Automate the repeatable checks so releases do not wait on a manual regression pass.
Managed Testing
Hand off the entire testing process to a dedicated QA lead. You focus on shipping.
Test Documentation
All testing documentation (plans, test cases, reports), so nothing falls through the cracks.
Quality Assurance
Catch the gap between what was spec’d and what actually shipped.
Independent Testing
A fresh pair of eyes with no stake in the outcome, just honest results.
Nine ways we stress what you shipped
Nine ways we stress what you shipped. Pick the depth, we’ll bring the rigor.
01
Functional Testing
Verify software complies with functional specifications by checking all required system capabilities.
02
Regression Testing
Confirm recent code changes haven’t adversely affected existing functionality or features.
03
GUI Testing
Examine graphical interfaces to prevent user issues and ensure positive user experiences.
04
Localization Testing
Evaluate products from linguistic and cultural perspectives to meet user language and location needs.
05
Performance Testing
Assess system speed, scalability, and stability under specific workloads for optimal performance.
06
UX / Usability Testing
Check if solutions are user-friendly and meet user expectations for smooth interactions.
07
Compatibility Testing
Verify solutions work properly across different browsers, operating systems, networks, and devices.
08
Integration Testing
Identify faults in interactions between integrated units to ensure modules work together seamlessly.
09
User Acceptance Testing
Validate that delivered software fully meets the defined project scope and user requirements.
AI-Code / Vibe-Code Production-Readiness Audit
A vibe-coded app, built with Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code, or Replit, demos cleanly and breaks predictably. We read the code the model never did and tell you what stops it from being safe for real users.
- ✓Authorization on every endpoint, the user-A-reads-user-B’s-data class of bug that demos never surface.
- ✓Input validation and the unhappy paths the prompt never asked for.
- ✓Secrets and environments: keys out of the repo, staging and production actually separated.
- ✓Error handling that fails closed instead of leaking stack traces to users.
- ✓A regression suite, so the next AI edit does not silently break what already works.
- ✓Observability and rollbacks, so you see failures and can undo a bad deploy.
- ✓An honest keep-vs-rebuild call on the generated code, not a reflex to throw it away.
Need the full fix, not just the findings? See Vibe Coding Rescue →
BEFORE YOU APPLY
Who our QA partnership is not for.
We test real products with real complexity. If you’re not there yet, we’ll tell you, and point you to the right room.
- Better fit Fractional Co-Founder
You don’t have a product built yet.
QA is post-build. If you’re pre-product, you want strategic product work first. That’s our Fractional Co-Founder lane.
You want a one-off bug bash for under a week.
Our minimum is one week at €750/week from the start. For a smaller bug bash, a freelance tester is the honest call.
You refuse to invest in test automation on principle.
Manual-only gets expensive fast. If automation is permanently off the table, we’re the wrong partnership.
- Better fit Software Development
You expect us to build the missing features ourselves.
We find the gaps and we’ll fix the bugs we find, but full feature builds are a different engagement, not a QA retainer.
You handle regulated data (SOC2, PCI, HIPAA) and skipped security review.
We test what’s there. We’re not your auditor. You need a compliance specialist alongside us, not instead of us.
Saying no is a service. We’d rather lose the deal than lose the user data.
Still unsure? Email [email protected] and we’ll point you somewhere honestHOW WE WORK
Your Journey with Wavect
From idea to paying customers, and the long haul beyond that.
You buy an outcome, not hours. Fixed price where the scope is clear, weekly retainer where it isn’t. If a retainer week moves nothing, you get it back.
Select your journey path
Find your direction
Fractional Co-Founders
A validated direction, backed by market signal instead of opinions.
- Price
- 400€ /week
- Model
- Weekly Retainer
Cancel anytime • Last week refunded if no impact
What’s included
Ideation & Market Validation
Helping you validate your idea and build the right product
- Market validation
- Strategy development
- Skip 3.5k€ discovery
- Validate fast & creatively with minimum funds
- Build for product-market-fit
- Define clear direction & strategy
- Prepare for development phase
- Typical horizon
- 4+ weeks, ongoing until direction is clear
Discovery Phase
A build plan and a fixed price, before development starts.
- Price
- 3.5k€ Fixed
- Model
- Fixed Price
Comprehensive technical foundation
What’s included
Technical Planning & Architecture
Everything you and we need to build a great and reliable product
- Technical planning
- Fixed price offer
- Launch plan
- Complete software architecture design
- Detailed milestone plan with timelines
- Technical flows and system diagrams
- Launch plan and rollout strategy
- Fixed price offer for development
- Typical horizon
- 1-3 weeks
Build & Launch
Software Development
Your product live with real customers, shipped milestone by milestone.
- Model
- Fixed Price or Weekly Retainer
Milestone-based, or weekly retainer for ongoing work
What’s included
Build & Launch
- Build your validated product concept
- Early go-live for market validation
- Milestone-based delivery (no half-baked products)
- Seamless transition from strategy to execution
- AI-powered development with human quality assurance
Maintain & Speed UpYou are here
Software Quality Assurance
A product that stays live, stays fast, and keeps shipping.
- Price
- 750€ /week
- Model
- Weekly Retainer
Cancel anytime • Last week refunded if no impact
What’s included
Maintain & Speed Up
- Reproduce release bugs, fix them and verify the fixes
- Ensure products work properly
- Maintain quality standards
- Speed up your internal developers
- QA for AI-assisted and Vibe-coded software
- Typical horizon
- Long-term partnership
Note: We also test products built by other teams, including vibe-coded software. New features and adjacent products are scoped separately as software development.
Long-term Partnership
We win when you win. That’s the alignment.
Free skills · No API key · No signup
Two free skills for teams shipping software that has to hold up
QA Advisor and Website ICP-Fit, the same prompts we run when we audit a codebase or a conversion funnel. Plug them into your own AI.
QA Advisor
Grades test quality, OWASP security, reliability, scalability, and won’t soften critical findings.
Website ICP-Fit
Audits your marketing site against your ICP. Tells you the one change that would move conversion most.
Not blown away? Money back. No questions.
How it works, in both directionsCancel any week.
No notice period, no exit fee, no questions.
Refund the last week.
Latest paid week or agreed fixed-price milestone. No explanation of dissatisfaction required.
No hours tracked.
We work to exceed expectations, not to fill timesheets.
OR
Fixed-price guarantee
Prefer a fixed scope and fixed price?
Money back for the agreed milestone. No questions asked. The signed scope and deadline still apply.
WHY THIS WORKS
Not our model: Pay by time
Pay for outcomes.
Two ways to work. One reason to deliver.
Fixed prices and weekly retainers. A money-back guarantee built into both.
Tell us the outcome
No hours tracked in either model.
02/ONGOING
Weekly retainers
- Cancel any week.
- Refund the last.
- No hours tracked.
Accountability is the foundation.
Not an add-on. Part of the deal.
That’s why this works. We both have skin in the game. How the guarantee works
Money back, no questions asked. Retainers cover the latest paid week. Fixed-price work covers the milestone agreed in your signed offer or statement of work. This is not an automatic refund of an entire project. Prepaid developer hours are a separate offer with their own published terms.
Latest paid week or agreed fixed-price milestone. No explanation of dissatisfaction required.
And if your expectations are detached from reality, we walk too. We work with operators, not lottery winners.
Walking out is not walking away. Anything we built ships documented, version-controlled, and ready for handover. No client is left holding a broken product.
Money back, no questions asked. Retainers cover the latest paid week. Fixed-price work covers the milestone agreed in your signed offer or statement of work. This is not an automatic refund of an entire project. Prepaid developer hours are a separate offer with their own published terms.
How we save you money
Bugs cost you money. Either through refunds, customer churn, law suits, data breaches or brand damage.
QA effort vs. relative cost
More QA effort means fewer costly failures but more spent on prevention and verification. The total stays low across a broad middle zone, not at one exact point.
Relative cost
Little checking
QA effort and quality
Exhaustive checking
- Failure cost Defects that reach users: rework, incidents, refunds, churn
- Prevention and verification Reviews, test design, automation, retests
- Total cost The sum of both curves
- Targeted QA Aims for the broad low-cost zone: test hardest where the risk sits.
Schematic illustration. Not measured data and not a cost forecast.
Why you THINK you’re fine
Your software first breaks slowly then all at once. Why wait?
Effort across releases
Postponing checks often looks cheaper in early releases. Over time, defects found late can pile up as rework and risk, and the effort gets harder to predict. Ongoing QA costs something every release and makes that effort more predictable.
Cumulative effort
Releases
- Ongoing QA Planned checks in every release
- Checks postponed Defects surface late, rework accumulates
- Shaded band How far the effort can swing
- Early on, postponing checks looks cheaper.
- Later, late-found defects can stack up as rework, and the range of possible effort widens.
Schematic illustration. Not measured data and not a cost forecast.
QA findings your team can reproduce
Example outputs for a QA engagement. We agree the release risks, environments and test scope first.
A risk-based test plan
Choose critical user journeys, permissions, edge cases and integrations, with explicit acceptance criteria.
Defects ready for remediation
Reproduction steps, severity and user impact for each finding, with evidence and a clear fix owner.
A release decision with evidence
Verify fixes and rerun the relevant regression checks. Report what passed, what failed and what remains untested.
Download the sample QA findings and retest report (Markdown)
// proofProof, not promises
Polity: service-specific test gates across seven microservices. Zybra: defect reproduction, fix verification and weekly release gates through a FinTech rebuild. Soundromeda: risk-based QA that took a vibe-coded game to production quality. Each case shows how our work supported the release.
7 services
Unified Testing
1.5 years owning QA across seven services and multiple vendors. Quality stayed shippable through every refactor.
React
Java/Kotlin
Go
Weekly
Release Gates Held
QA governance through a high-change rebuild, release safety held weekly, hundreds of defects closed.
Node.js
Typescript
PostgreSQL
Production
Vibe-Coded → Hardened
QA-led hardening took a vibe-coded game prototype to a state grant committees backed.
These are selected projects, not our full portfolio. We have shipped 100+ products since 2018.
What clients say
Clutch
WAVECT GmbH’s intelligence, professionalism, and willingness to dig into the project are impressive.
AI summary · Clutch
WAVECT GmbH has successfully completed a milestone grant for Polygon, which included technical functionality and external public user adoption. The team manifests their professionalism through timely deliverables, and their knowledge and thorough approach have been truly commendable.
Google
Shipped what would normally take a bigger team a lot longer. Report overhaul, security hardening, infrastructure tightening, they owned it end to end. They kept production stable through pilot prep and investor demos. They communicated clearly and never made us chase a status update. Awesome team!
Trustpilot
TOP! Excellent teamwork and communication. Smooth and efficient collaboration. Highly recommended partnership!
Independently rated 5.0/5 on Clutch Read the reviews
Scope accessibility before promising an audit
List critical tasks and representative pages, states, devices and assistive technologies. Agree the criteria, methods, qualified participants and reporting limits before commissioning the work. A reproducible finding records user impact, steps, expected behavior and retest status. A scan alone cannot establish accessibility. Our accessibility assessment buyer guide helps prepare that brief. Remediation, specialist testing and retesting are distinct scope decisions; no certification or legal assurance is implied. A dedicated WCAG 2.2 audit with remediation and retest is scoped through Accessibility Audit.
Get a release recommendation you can act on
Agree the business-journey register, coverage denominator, supported environments, run cadence and change limits. Findings identify version, environment, reproduction, verified business impact, fix owner and remaining risk; duplicates and false alarms are investigated before escalation. The report recommends release, correction or further investigation. The €750/week QA offer keeps its current terms for a supported estate; material setup, application fixes and new features are separately scoped from test maintenance. Local language, payment or device verification can use an agreed specialist, with a bounded matrix and separate quote. A passing suite is evidence for its stated scope.
See the illustrative decision, release and handover evidence.
A prepared response when a dependency changes
For a qualifying care agreement, assess supportability and stabilization first. Agree a limited register of APIs, versions, certificates, renewals, usage budgets and access dependencies. Each material trigger has impact, options, recommendation, cost, owner and next update; record whether action was executed, declined or blocked. Major upgrades, new spending, production changes and cancellations require agreed authority. Care keeps the system healthy; adoption improvement is a separate funded decision. Coverage follows the signed agreement.
A fixed unit for one critical journey
One-off package: the acceptance and fee-protection milestones below apply. Weekly-retainer and Fast Lane terms belong to their own engagements.
Protect one critical journey
Stable automated checks that demonstrate a real failure is detected.
Within 5 business days of the booked ready start.
€1,250
net, one-off
- One existing journey, up to 5 actions, one role, desktop Chromium.
- One happy path and 2 agreed failure cases in existing Playwright/CI.
- Passing evidence, a safe negative control, artifact, instructions and next owner.
Before booking: An existing JavaScript/TypeScript web application we maintain, repeatable staging, working test identity/data, service mocks and CI.
Payment milestones: €1,000 for accepted test artifacts/preparation; €250 on evidenced acceptance. One correction/retest is included.
Scope, acceptance and fee protection
What earns the fee: The agreed checks pass and a safe negative control proves the relevant failure is caught. You receive the code, evidence and maintenance owner.
Scope limits: No new CI foundation, live payment movement, unstable third-party flows, broad security/accessibility audit, mobile matrix, material app fixes or ongoing maintenance.
Your agreed milestone is corrected once within 5 business days. If it still fails, its unearned fee is waived or prepaid unearned amounts refunded within 10 business days. If Wavect’s failure makes the whole package unusable, we refund the whole package within the same 10 business days after that correction opportunity. Scope, acceptance and any client/vendor waiting are recorded before booking; we show the reason and revised date when a dependency pauses the affected clock. These package terms are written into your scope and preserve your existing rights. For these packages, business days are Monday to Friday excluding Austrian public holidays; dates use Europe/Vienna. Separately, our satisfaction guarantee covers the agreed fixed-price milestone: its fee is refunded if you are not satisfied, without requiring an explanation.
A budget for bugs. A price for accepted results.
For a working app, including a vibe-coded one: choose a bounded functional test pass, optional accepted findings and separately approved repairs. Set the spending limit before work starts.
Your ceiling comes first
Coverage + up to 5 accepted findings: at most €1,500. Repairs need a separately approved quote within your total cap. Unused authorization is not invoiced.
Test the agreed scope
€750
One coverage pass across up to 12 agreed scenarios and 3 journeys. You receive the results even when no bug is found.
Per accepted finding
€150
One material, reproducible defect. Same root cause or same corrective change: one fee. Severity changes priority, never this price.
Per accepted repair
- Small
- €600
- Standard
- €1,200
Eligible small repair: €600. Standard repair: €1,200. An already paid €150 finding fee is credited toward that repair.
Already know the bug? For a bug you can reproduce, request a repair-only quote. No finding fee; a coverage pass is needed only if separately agreed.
Net prices; applicable tax is additional. One-off scope with its own correction/refund terms; an alternative to weekly QA for the same work.
Classification, acceptance and fee protection
Impact sets priority. Complexity sets the repair quote.
- S1: Critical functional impact
- An agreed core task is blocked, or a material data or transaction error is demonstrated. Triage first; severity does not authorize production changes.
- S2: Major functional impact
- An agreed task fails or is materially degraded, with a usable workaround.
- S3: Minor functional impact
- A reproducible functional deviation with limited impact. Cosmetic preferences and new features are outside the default scope.
Ready before the clock starts
Agree the exact scenarios, expected behavior, known-issue list, material-impact threshold, approver, finding allowance, total spending cap and dates. One working staging build, one role and one browser/device configuration; repeatable test data and authorized access are required. Deliver the coverage pass within 5 business days of the booked ready start. Record client/vendor waits and a revised date. Unknown or broken systems need a separately agreed assessment first.
Coverage has value without findings
The coverage fee earns an accepted scenario list, pass/fail/blocked results, tested build and configuration, limitations and observed issues. Complete the promised coverage and disclose further observed issues after the finding allowance is reached, without extra finding fees. A blocked or incomplete pass is not silently accepted. Testing selected behavior is not a security audit, production-readiness certification or a promise of no other bugs.
Only accepted, distinct evidence is charged
The finding fee adds validated reproduction, expected versus actual behavior, material impact, build/environment evidence and duplicate checking to the coverage record. Charge only for previously unreported, in-scope defects accepted in writing by the named client reviewer; silence is not acceptance. Include one clarification/reproduction round. Disputes stay unbilled until resolved. Valid findings remain payable if you choose not to repair them.
One cause, one charge
Group manifestations sharing an underlying defect or the same corrective change, including repeats across pages, fields or test runs. Where uncertain, group conservatively before invoicing. No finding fee for already supplied reproducible issues, known issues, duplicates, out-of-scope observations or work Wavect already owes. Notify observed security risks safely; specialist investigation needs its own agreed scope.
A repair needs its own acceptance
Before implementation, agree the repair class, exact change, affected components, regression checks, delivery date and remaining budget. Small means a localized, understood change; standard means a bounded change with understood interactions. Uncertain repairs, rebuilds, data migrations and specialist security work need a separate fixed quote or discovery. Delivery is the agreed source change and passing agreed checks in the named environment; deployment is included only if stated. A severe issue can have a small fix.
Finding credit, not a second charge
After a paid finding, a small repair adds €450; a standard repair adds €1,050. For a client-supplied reproducible bug, quote the repair directly without a finding fee; a coverage pass is needed only if separately agreed. Larger quotes state any finding credit explicitly. The same test or repair cannot be billed again under a retainer or fixed package. No fees for Wavect regressions, warranty work or corrections already owed.
Reserve the whole allowance
Reserve the coverage fee, the entire approved finding allowance and every approved incremental repair before work starts. A standard repair of one of those paid findings alongside the full assessment allowance needs a €2,550 cap. Reserve the full quoted repair price when no finding credit applies. A smaller cap needs a smaller allowance or scope agreed first. Pause new chargeable scope until you approve a revised cap; never expand it automatically or withhold already promised coverage. Unused approval is not an invoice.
Correction and refund
For failed agreed work, allow correction/retest within 5 business days, then waive unearned fees or refund prepaid unearned fees within 10 business days. Invalid or duplicate paid findings are corrected or refunded. An independently valid accepted finding can remain earned if its repair fails. If Wavect failure makes the whole engagement unusable, the whole engagement fee is refunded on the same clock. These are one-off terms; the weekly-retainer guarantee stays separate.
One clear budget example
Reserve €1,950 for coverage, up to 5 accepted findings and a small repair of one of those paid findings. With only one accepted finding and that repair, the invoice is €1,350. With no accepted findings or repairs, it is €750. This is an illustration, not a customer result.
When the risk extends beyond application QA
Product behavior and regression coverage stay with QA. For repository permissions, dependency controls and release evidence, continue with DevSecOps. For model inputs, retrieval permissions, tool calls and agent actions, use AI application security. An independent review of a software asset before an investment, acquisition or board decision is Technical Due Diligence.
FAQs
Answers to your most pressing QA concerns
End any week, with one message. No notice period, no exit interview, no fine print. We invoice weekly, so the most you’re ever committed to is the current week.
It’s in your contract: tell us, and we refund that week. No questions, no invoices to dispute, no calls to escalate. The only rule: refunds apply to the most recent week.
Because hours are the wrong metric. If we optimize for hours billed, we do not optimize for your outcome. The deal is simpler: every week has a defined result, and we earn the next week by delivering it. You pay for progress against that result, not for a timesheet.
We work with operators, not lottery winners. If a request would require breaking physics, the law, or a third party’s systems, we say so, and if we can’t align, we walk. The guarantee is mutual: you can fire us any week; we can also fire ourselves.
Yes, and it is one of our most-requested engagements. We run a production-readiness pass on AI-generated code from Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code, Replit, and similar tools: the gaps the model skipped, like authorization, input validation, leaked secrets, error handling, and queries that do not scale. See QA for AI-generated code.
Yes. We do a structured read of vibe-coded code you may never have read yourself, score the findings by severity, and hand back a fixed branch with tests, not a PDF of complaints. See the vibe-coded software audit and taking a Lovable or Cursor prototype to production.
Authorization on every endpoint, input validation, a secret sweep, failure-path coverage, query and load review, concurrency, dependency and licence scanning, and a regression suite so the next change does not silently break what works. It is the lens we apply to anything built with vibe coding; the full checklist is in QA for AI-generated code.
Developer tests verify implementation. Independent QA puts the product through real user journeys, awkward inputs, permission boundaries and release pressure. We turn the findings into reproducible steps, prioritized repairs and verified fixes so your team can ship with a clear view of the risks.
Domain expertise is crucial, which is why we start every engagement with a deep-dive discovery phase. We study your user personas, business workflows, regulatory requirements, and competitive landscape. We interview your team, shadow user sessions, and review support tickets to understand real-world usage. Our QA specialists become temporary domain experts. In fact, our outside perspective often catches issues that internal teams miss because they’re too close to the product.
Automated testing is excellent for regression testing and repetitive checks, but it can only find bugs in scenarios you programmed it to look for. Manual testing discovers the unexpected, usability issues, visual bugs, performance problems under real conditions, and edge cases you never thought to automate. We use both: automation for efficiency and consistency, manual testing for discovery and user experience validation. Think of automation as a safety net, manual testing as exploration.
We have extensive experience with GDPR, and other compliance frameworks. Our testing includes: data privacy validation, security vulnerability assessments, audit trail verification, and compliance workflow testing. We sign additional NDAs, work with anonymized/masked data when possible, and can work within your secure environments. We also test the compliance controls themselves, not just the application functionality.
In our first 30 days, we typically find 40-70% more issues than internal teams were catching. Why? Fresh perspective, systematic testing methodology, focus on user experience over feature functionality, and dedicated time for exploratory testing. Internal teams often have deadline pressure and feature tunnel vision. We’ve prevented critical production issues worth tens of thousands in damage/refunds.
Integration testing is one of our specialties. We create comprehensive test environments that simulate third-party service responses, including failure scenarios (API downtime, rate limiting, data format changes). We test graceful degradation when services are unavailable and data consistency across systems. We also perform contract testing to ensure your integration assumptions remain valid. Many critical bugs happen at integration points, we make sure those connections are bulletproof.
We perform risk-based triage. Not all bugs are launch-blockers. We categorize issues by: user impact severity, business risk level, workaround availability, and fix complexity. We help you make informed decisions about what must be fixed pre-launch vs what can be patched post-launch. Our goal is to prevent catastrophic launch failures while not unnecessarily delaying time-to-market. We’ve helped teams successfully launch with known low-impact issues while ensuring zero critical bugs.
We integrate directly into your agile workflow. We participate in sprint planning, review user stories for testability, and start test case preparation before development completes. We perform continuous testing throughout the sprint, not just at the end. Our team uses the same tools you do (Jira, Confluence, Slack) and provides real-time feedback. We can scale our testing capacity up or down based on release complexity and timeline constraints.
Web E2E: Playwright (default), Cypress when the team is already invested. API: Postman/Newman in CI, REST Assured for JVM stacks, or pytest+httpx for Python services. Mobile: Appium, Maestro, or Detox depending on app architecture. Load and performance: K6, Gatling, JMeter for legacy stacks. Security testing: OWASP ZAP baseline plus Burp Suite for deeper engagements. We pick what your team can maintain after we leave, not what’s flashiest.
// More in
More in Product Design & Quality
Software Discovery and Requirements
Clarify software requirements, architecture and milestones through Wavect’s existing discovery offer. See the inputs, example acceptance criteria and next steps.
Explore the scopeUX/UI Design
Flows, clickable prototypes and UI for software you are building, checked with real users and handed over dev-ready.
Explore the scopeAccessibility Audit
WCAG 2.2 audits of web and mobile apps with reproducible findings, prioritized fixes and a retest. No certification, no legal opinion.
Explore the scopeCancel any week.
Refund the last week.
No hours tracked.
First week not worth it? Refunded, no questions.
Ship with independent QA. €750/week.
Get the full service at €750 per week from the start. If you’re not satisfied, your last week is refunded, no questions asked. Cancel anytime.
First week not worth it? Refunded, no questions.
No lock-in. No fine print. Just results.
Cancel Anytime
100+ Products Shipped
10+ Years Experience
Optional Fast Lane
Need it sooner?
More agreed work in the same week, or the same scope sooner, with extra reserved capacity and unchanged quality checks. Miss the booked earlier date and 100% of the Fast Lane surcharge comes back.
Optional per milestone, quoted after a readiness check.