WAVECT vs RUBICON

Wavect or Rubicon. A senior custom-build and AI team, or an established eGovernment product house for public administration.

These are two different categories, and honesty about that is the whole point. Rubicon builds and operates records and document-management software for the public sector, with Acta Nova as its flagship, its own certified data centre, and roughly 240 people per their published figures. We are a small senior team that builds custom software and AI, with both founders on every call and weekly outcome billing. If you are a public authority buying a proven records platform through a tender, Rubicon is built for exactly that. If you need custom product engineering, AI enablement, or fractional technical leadership, the comparison is not close, because it is not the same purchase.

Book a thirty-minute call
// 01

Decision snapshot

VerdictRubicon is built to sell and operate a mature eGovernment content-management product for public administration. Wavect is built for custom builds, AI enablement, and senior technical leadership where the answer is not an off-the-shelf platform.

Wavect is best when

  • You need custom software or an AI capability built, not a licensed records-management product configured.
  • The buyer is a founder, product owner, or innovation lead who needs senior judgement and speed, not a tender process.
  • You want fractional CTO or CPO depth and both founders accountable for the outcome.

The alternative is best when

  • You are a public authority that needs a proven GEVER-style records, document, and workflow platform.
  • Procurement requires an established vendor, ISO 27001 hosting, and long-term operation of the system.
  • The requirement is standardised electronic file management at administrative scale, not greenfield product work.

Questions to ask before you choose

  1. Do you need a product configured, or something new built? That single answer usually decides the vendor.
  2. Is the buying constraint public-sector procurement and long-term operation, or product speed and senior judgement?
  3. How central is AI to what you are buying, versus records and document management?

Commercial risk to watch

  • A product-and-hosting model can mean platform lock-in: the records data, workflows, and operations sit inside a proprietary stack per their published model. Confirm export and exit terms before you commit.
  • Public-sector product houses sell through tenders and typically do not publish pricing. Expect a longer procurement cycle than a small senior team.
  • Private-sector track record is comparatively recent: the December 2023 Pride Capital stake was described in public reporting as funding exactly that expansion. Ask for references close to your own use case.

Evidence notes

  • Rubicon size, product, certification, ownership, and client-reference claims are stated per their published pages and public reporting, and should be checked against current sources.
  • This comparison separates a product purchase from a custom-build purchase. It does not rank engineering quality, and Acta Nova is not a product Wavect competes with feature for feature.
// 02

How they actually differ

Six dimensions where Wavect and Rubicon are genuinely different purchases.

WAVECT DIMENSION ALTERNATIVE

A senior team that builds custom software and AI, plus fractional CTO and CPO leadership.

WHAT YOU ACTUALLY BUY

A licensed eGovernment content-management product (Acta Nova), configured and usually operated for you.

Founders, product teams, scale-ups, and enterprise pilots where judgement beats headcount.

PRIMARY MARKET

Public administration at federal, regional, and municipal level, per their published references.

Small senior-only team in Austria. Both founders in the room.

SIZE AND STRUCTURE

Roughly 240 people, offices in Vienna, Bern, and Berlin, per their published figures.

Weekly outcome fee or fixed-price Werkvertrag. No timesheets, cancel any week.

PRICING MODEL

Product licensing plus operation, sold through public-sector tenders. Pricing not published.

We build on your stack or a portable one. You own the code and can take it anywhere.

HOSTING AND LOCK-IN

Own ISO 27001 data centre and long-term operation. Confirm data export and exit terms.

AI enablement and custom AI builds are a core practice, not an add-on.

AI AND FRONTIER DEPTH

AI features referenced within document management. Records and ECM is the core identity.

// 03

The real difference, in practice

Rubicon is good at something specific and does it at scale. For more than two decades it has built and operated records, document, and workflow management for public administration, with Acta Nova as the flagship and, per their published figures, well over seventy thousand public-sector users. It runs its own ISO 27001-certified data centre and lists references like the Swiss Federal Administration. If you are a public authority that needs a proven electronic-file platform, operated for the long term by a certified vendor, that is a real and sensible reason to talk to them, and we will not pretend otherwise.

The honest point is that this is a product purchase, not an agency engagement. You are licensing and configuring a mature platform and, in most cases, having Rubicon host and operate it. That is the right shape when your requirement is standard records management. It is the wrong shape when the thing you need does not exist yet, when the differentiator is custom product engineering, or when AI is central rather than an add-on. Rubicon mentions AI in document handling, but its identity is records and document management, not AI enablement.

We are the opposite shape. Both founders sit on every call, the senior who scopes the work does the work, and you pay a weekly outcome fee you can cancel any week, or a fixed-price Werkvertrag when scope is clear. We build custom software and AI capabilities, and we take fractional CTO and CPO mandates where the value is judgement and execution in the same head. Where a product house is incentivised to fit you to the platform, we are incentivised to tell you when a feature should not ship.

One commercial note worth raising plainly: a proprietary product plus vendor-operated hosting can create lock-in around your data and workflows. That is not a criticism of the software, it is a question every buyer should ask before signing. If your requirement is a records platform, hire the platform. If you need something built or an AI capability stood up, see how we run build engagements .

// 04

When each is the better call

// 01

When Wavect is the better call

  • You need something built or an AI capability stood up, not a records product configured.
  • You want both founders and the senior engineer who scoped the work on every call, with no vendor account layer.
  • You want weekly outcomes you can cancel any week, or a fixed-price Werkvertrag, instead of a tender and a multi-year operating contract.
  • AI, custom product engineering, or fractional technical leadership is the actual need.
// 02

When Rubicon is the better call

  • You are a public authority and you need a proven GEVER-style records, document, and workflow platform. That is what Acta Nova is for.
  • Procurement requires an established vendor with ISO 27001-certified hosting and long-term system operation.
  • The job is standardised electronic file management at administrative scale, not greenfield product work.
  • You want a vendor to license, host, and run the platform for you over many years, and that model fits your governance.

If you need a proven records platform for public administration, Rubicon is built for it. If you need custom software, AI enablement, or fractional technical leadership, talk to us.

// 05

Relevant Wavect work

// 06

FAQs

Only loosely. Rubicon sells and operates an eGovernment content-management product for the public sector. We build custom software and AI and take fractional CTO and CPO mandates. If your requirement is a records platform, they are the right call, not us. The overlap is mainly that both are Austrian software firms.
When you are a public authority that needs a proven electronic file, records, and workflow platform, operated for the long term by a certified vendor. Acta Nova is used across public administration per their published figures. If that is the job, hire them and do not look back.
It is a fair question for any proprietary product plus vendor-operated hosting, not a specific accusation. Your records data and workflows live inside their stack. Before signing, ask for data export formats, exit terms, and what happens to operations if you change vendors. Good vendors answer these clearly.
Yes, quite a lot. Rubicon references AI inside document handling, but its identity is records and document management. AI enablement and custom AI builds are a core practice for us. If AI is central to what you are buying, that is squarely our side of the line.
Source: rubicon.eu
Last reviewed: byKevin Riedl wiki ↗

Still weighing the options?

Tell us what you are building. We will tell you straight which route fits, no pitch.

Book a thirty-minute call