WAVECT vs GENESIS TECHNOLOGIES

Wavect or Genesis Technologies. The closest call on this page.

Two small Austrian senior teams, both founder on every call, both with Web3 in our roots. Genesis leans on being Web3-native. So are we, which is exactly why that is not the line between us. We came up on-chain too, then kept going into full products, AI, and fractional CTO, with seven figures secured live on mainnet and 75+ shipped since 2018. Genesis publishes a narrower service list and three figures: $2M+ value migrated, 10+ products shipped, 5+ years delivering. Those product counts are not measured the same way on both sides, so the headlines are not the thing to weigh. Name the job instead. A token migration or a GameFi build close to Treasure Hunter, weigh them. A product where the chain is one pillar among web, mobile, and AI, talk to us.

Book a thirty-minute call

Independent comparison published by Wavect. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Genesis Technologies.

// 01

Decision snapshot

VerdictThe practical split: if your job is a token migration, or a GameFi build close to Treasure Hunter, which the Genesis proof section labels a live GameFi product, Genesis is a strong, honest pick and we will tell you so.2 For a product where the chain is one pillar among web, mobile, and AI, talk to us.

Wavect is best when

  • You want on-chain depth you can open and check. We have seven figures secured live on mainnet across bridges, wallets, and payments, and we hand over the contract addresses.
  • Your product is wider than the chain. Web, mobile, and AI matter too, and you want one team owning all of it as fractional CTO.
  • You want AI built into the product your users touch, not only operational agents behind the scenes.

The alternative is best when

  • You have a cross-chain token migration. Genesis publishes a $2M+ value-migrated figure and lists token migration first in its capability pillars.1
  • You are launching a GameFi product close to Treasure Hunter, which the proof section labels a live GameFi product.2 Ask for the live URL and open it before you shortlist anyone, us included.

Questions to ask before you choose

  1. Genesis publishes 10+ products shipped over 5+ years delivering; we publish 75+ products shipped since 2018.1 Neither count is audited and neither of us defines a shipped product the same way, so ask both of us for contract addresses and live URLs and compare the deployments directly.
  2. The Austrian company register records Genesis Technologies FlexCo as entered on 4 June 2025, while the site states 5+ years delivering.71 Those are two different measurements, the age of the legal entity and the account the team gives of its own delivery history, and putting both here is not a suggestion that either is wrong. Ask which legal entity would sign your contract, and ask us the same: Wavect started as an e.U. in 2018 and was incorporated as a GmbH in 2022.
  3. The team section lists three people, Founder and CEO, CTO and a fullstack developer, and states no total headcount beyond that.3 Ask who exactly would deliver your project and what happens when one of them is unavailable, then put the same question to us.
  4. Genesis publishes no rate card, and its pricing route resolves to the contact form.5 Delivery is described as milestones out of a Discovery and Architecture phase.4 Ask what the Discovery phase costs and how the milestone payment schedule works, then compare it against our published weekly band.

Commercial risk to watch

  • The visible price is not the whole cost. Genesis publishes no rate card, so the cost shape only becomes visible once the Discovery and Architecture phase is scoped.54
  • Ask what the vendor is paid to increase: hours, seats, retained advice, platform usage, or shipped outcomes. Put the question to us as well.

Evidence notes

  • Every statement about Genesis Technologies on this page is sourced below, with the date we opened each page. Open them and check them yourself.
  • This comparison uses published figures and the Austrian company register.7 It carries no claim about how well Genesis Technologies delivers, and the two shipped-product counts on this page are not comparable measures.
// 02

Project fit: not limited to small builds

Project size and provider headcount are separate decisions. Wavect’s delivery unit is a named senior core, but that does not limit the work to MVPs or short startup projects. Larger projects are split into phases with separate budgets and acceptance criteria. We also build internal systems and process automations inside a client’s existing repositories, tooling and workflows. A vetted bench supports continuity and scope-specific capacity. A larger provider may still be the better choice when the main requirement is several parallel teams, an incumbent framework agreement or certifications Wavect does not currently hold.
// 03

How they actually differ

Six dimensions where two very similar Austrian shops actually diverge.

WAVECT DIMENSION ALTERNATIVE

Full product across web, mobile, AI, and on-chain. Fractional CTO running the build-or-not call across the whole surface, not just the chain.

SCOPE FOCUS

Published capability pillars sit in the Web3 lane: token migrations, smart contracts, DeFi flows and on-chain integrations, plus an AI automation layer.1 Same on-chain origin as ours, on a narrower published list.

Public mainnet products with seven figures secured live across bridges, wallets, and payments, plus AI built inside shipped products.

FLAGSHIP STRENGTH

$2M+ value migrated is the headline figure, with token migration listed first in the capability pillars.1 Two published proof cards: Treasure Hunter as a live GameFi product and Pineapple as a client delivery.2

AI engineering as a product capability. AI features built into the product your users touch.

AI POSITIONING

AI automation layer. Agent workflows aimed at operations, internal tooling, and blockchain data tasks.1

Senior only. One to three people per engagement, founder in every call. Genesis publishes a comparable shape.3

TEAM MODEL

The team section lists three people, Founder and CEO, CTO and a fullstack developer, and describes the team as intentionally small. No total headcount published beyond that.3

Weekly outcome retainer from 400 EUR per week, full-stack delivery 10,000 to 30,000 EUR per month, or fixed-price Werkvertrag from 3,500 EUR (Discovery Phase).

PRICING MODEL

Milestone-scoped delivery out of a Discovery and Architecture phase.4 No rate card published, and the pricing route resolves to the contact form.5

Founded 2018 as an e.U., GmbH since 2022. 75+ products shipped, 17 countries, Google 5.0, Trustpilot 4.5, Clutch 5.0.

TRACK RECORD

Published figures: 10+ products shipped, 5+ years delivering, $2M+ value migrated.1 Registered as Genesis Technologies FlexCo at the Commercial Court Vienna on 4 June 2025, FN 654867 s, status registered.7 The two product counts on this page are not measured the same way, so compare deployments rather than headlines.

// 04

The real difference, in practice

This is the hardest comparison to write on the whole page, because Genesis is built the way we are. Their team section describes an intentionally small senior team and lists three people, a Founder and CEO, a CTO and a fullstack developer.3 We run one to three senior people per engagement with a founder in every call. So this one does not turn on team model or seniority, and it does not turn on who is more Web3-native either, because both of us came up on-chain. On shape and heritage, we are near twins.

Here is what Genesis publishes. The site presents a software agency in Vienna, Austria, with three figures in the band under the hero: $2M+ value migrated, 10+ products shipped, and 5+ years delivering.1 The capability pillars are token migrations, smart contracts, DeFi flows and on-chain integrations, plus an AI automation layer aimed at operations, internal tooling and blockchain data tasks.1 The proof section shows two cards, Treasure Hunter labelled a live GameFi product and Pineapple labelled a client delivery.2 Delivery runs as milestones through Discovery, Architecture, Build and Launch.4 For a token migration or a GameFi build close to that pattern, they are a serious, credible pick, and we will say so.

On the legal side, the entity behind the site is Genesis Technologies FlexCo, a flexible Kapitalgesellschaft with share capital of EUR 10 000, seat in 1100 Vienna, FN 654867 s at the Commercial Court Vienna, entered on 4 June 2025 and currently recorded as registered.76 The site separately states 5+ years delivering.1 Those two things measure different objects: the register records the current legal entity, and the figure is the account the team gives of its own delivery history. Setting them next to each other is not an allegation that either is inaccurate. It matters commercially for one narrow reason. For a high-value token migration you should know which entity signs and what stands behind it, and EUR 10 000 is the statutory minimum capital for this legal form, which says nothing about the ability of the team to deliver. Ask them, and ask us: Wavect started as an e.U. in 2018 and was incorporated as a GmbH in 2022.

We took the same on-chain start and went wider. We run as fractional CTO across the whole product, web, mobile, AI inside the product, and on-chain when it is needed. On-chain we have cross-chain bridges with seven figures secured live, account abstraction on mainnet, and RWA and crypto payments in production. Our published figures are 75+ products shipped since 2018 and work across 17 countries. Genesis publishes 10+ products shipped.1 Those two counts are not measured the same way, neither is audited, and neither of us defines a shipped product identically, so the headlines should not be weighed against each other. Ask both of us for contract addresses and live URLs and compare the deployments directly.

Name the job and the choice gets clear. A token migration or a GameFi build close to Treasure Hunter, weigh Genesis.2 On-chain product work in general, or a product where the chain is one pillar among web, mobile, and AI, talk to us. See how we build on-chain .

// 05

When each is the better call

// 01

When Wavect is the better call

  • You want on-chain depth you can open and check. We have seven figures secured live on mainnet across bridges, wallets, and payments, and we hand over the contract addresses.
  • Your product is wider than the chain. Web, mobile, and AI matter too, and you want one team owning all of it as fractional CTO.
  • You want AI built into the product your users touch, not only operational agents behind the scenes.
  • Track record matters to you. Our published figures are 75+ products shipped since 2018 across 17 countries. Genesis publishes 10+ products shipped over 5+ years delivering.1 The two counts are not measured the same way, so ask both of us for deployments you can open.
// 02

When Genesis Technologies is the better call

  • You have a cross-chain token migration. Genesis publishes a $2M+ value-migrated figure and lists token migration first in its capability pillars.1
  • You are launching a GameFi product close to Treasure Hunter, which the proof section labels a live GameFi product.2 Ask for the live URL and open it before you shortlist anyone, us included.

If your job is a token migration, or a GameFi build close to Treasure Hunter, which the proof section labels a live GameFi product, Genesis is a strong, honest pick and we will tell you so.2 For a product where the chain is one pillar among web, mobile, and AI, talk to us.

// 06

Relevant Wavect work

// 07

FAQs

More than almost anyone else on this page. Both are small Austrian senior teams and both came up on-chain, and their team section describes an intentionally small senior team of three.3 The difference is the breadth of the published scope, not who is more Web3-native. Genesis publishes a Web3 capability list plus an AI automation layer.1 We build full products and run fractional CTO on top of the same on-chain start.
Web3-native is shared history rather than a line between us, because both of us came up on-chain. What you can actually check is the published proof on each side. Genesis publishes $2M+ value migrated, 10+ products shipped and 5+ years delivering, plus Treasure Hunter as a live GameFi product.12 We publish 75+ products shipped since 2018 and seven figures secured live on mainnet. The two figure sets do not measure the same thing, so ask both of us for contract addresses and live URLs and compare the deployments directly.
It is worth weighing them. Cross-chain token migration is the specialty the site leads with, and the published figure is $2M+ value migrated.1 The site does not break down what that figure covers, so ask which chains, which tokens and which contracts, and ask us the same about our own on-chain work. If a focused migration is the entire job, a narrow specialty is a fair reason to shortlist them.
Go wider. We run fractional CTO across web, mobile, AI inside the product, and on-chain, with seven figures secured live on mainnet. Genesis publishes a Web3 capability list plus an AI automation layer aimed at operations, internal tooling and blockchain data tasks.1 That is a narrower published scope, which for a narrowly scoped job is an advantage rather than a drawback.
The honest answer is that the two public figure sets cannot settle it. Genesis publishes 10+ products shipped over 5+ years delivering.1 We publish 75+ products shipped since 2018 across 17 countries. Neither number is audited and neither of us defines a shipped product the same way, so the headlines should not be weighed against each other. Ask both of us for contract addresses and live URLs and compare the deployments directly. Separately, the register records the entity behind their site, Genesis Technologies FlexCo, as entered on 4 June 2025, which measures the legal entity rather than the team history the site describes.7 Stating both is not a suggestion that either is wrong.
Yes, GameFi sits inside the on-chain products we build. Genesis publishes Treasure Hunter as a live GameFi product, so for a build close to that pattern their public reference is directly on point.2 Ask them for the live URL, and ask us for ours.
Source: genesis.co.at
Last reviewed: byKevin Riedl wiki ↗

Sources for the statements about Genesis Technologies

Every numbered claim above links to the source we checked, with the date we checked it. Linking a source is not a partnership or an endorsement.

  1. Homepage: the Software agency, Vienna, Austria line, the figure band ($2M+ value migrated, 10+ products shipped, 5+ years delivering) and the capability pillars (token migrations, smart contracts, DeFi flows, on-chain integrations, AI automation layer) Genesis Technologies. retrieved 2026-08-04
  2. Proof section: Treasure Hunter labelled a live GameFi product and Pineapple labelled a client delivery Genesis Technologies. retrieved 2026-08-04
  3. Team section: an intentionally small senior team, three people listed as Founder and CEO, CTO and fullstack developer, with no total headcount stated Genesis Technologies. retrieved 2026-08-04
  4. Delivery process section: Discovery, Architecture, Build and Launch, with milestones framed around what can be shipped and maintained after launch Genesis Technologies. retrieved 2026-08-04
  5. Pricing route: carries no rate card and resolves to the contact form Genesis Technologies. retrieved 2026-08-04
  6. Legal disclosure under section 5 ECG: 1100 Vienna address, company registration number FN 654867 s, Commercial Court Vienna Genesis Technologies. retrieved 2026-08-04
  7. Austrian company register entry: Genesis Technologies FlexCo, flexible Kapitalgesellschaft, share capital EUR 10 000, seat 1100 Vienna, entered 4 June 2025, status registered evi.gv.at, Austrian company register data. retrieved 2026-08-04

Still weighing the options?

Tell us what you are building. We will tell you straight which route fits, no pitch.

Book a thirty-minute call